Burning Thoughts
Trump has three main threads as I see it. He stresses different notes at different times, always emphasizing that his skill, rather that details, will overcome obstacles that questioners pose
Reliance on belief only leads us astray when we must ignore facts. Facts are correctives to flawed beliefs.
The past shows that Trump mania is always been followed by ruined associates. Are we, the nation, to be the next associates?
It’s important that impeachment discussions focus on the most glaring offenses. Otherwise his supporters can ignore the major, respond to the minor, and in sum claim that impeachment is just sour grapes by anti-Trumpers. What…
It is up to the free press to put the various perspectives in a rational perspective when the stories themselves are being told.
For the sake of elections based on facts, dark advertising must be brought into the light.
Mass media channels promote associations between political persons, issues, and value judgements. The volume of repetitions leads to linked associations.
No matter how difficulties these proposals may be, they are certainly less than those the founding fathers faced when they wrote the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
Do you think that Trump’s many years of questioning Obama’s US citizenship was a legitimate concern or actually an insight into Trump’s view of who is a legitimate American?