Does Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle tell us there
will always be a limit to the accuracy with which we know things?
Does the fact that the human brain deals with probabilities
leave open the opportunity that ratiocination cannot dictate an absolute
understanding of why we do things?
Certainly
Human physiology has homeostasis. Are there other conditions
when humans have no determined way to act or have no compulsion to act?
Are they that the only situations when free will can be observed?
Don't we sometimes wait after the first sign of hunger come to our
notice?
Information from human senses arrive at the brain, after shunting through
'almost gates. Eg. if 5 of 7 feeder neurons are on, then they trigger
the next cell as if all cells were fired.
If we have free will, is it necessary that our acts not be explainable?
Can there every be a final answer to a 'why'?
Does Goedel's theorem that there are propositions that can neither be
proved nor disproved imply that strict logic from preconditions can't
conclusively indicate which 'consequence' will follow?
Or is it an artifact of modeling reality rather than reality? See
Potential Infinity
Was Laplace wrong when he asserted that if he knew the positions and
momenta of all celestial objects he could tell where they had ever been
and where they would ever be?
Yes. If we exploded all our nuclear bombs in strategic Lunar locations,
we could obliterate the moon and Laplace's observations would have
never predicted it.
Does fractal theory show that even small errors in facts can lead to
large errors in conclusions?
