Best of All Worlds
The Invisible Hand of capitalism is an important concept in free market economies. Unfortunately, it is often wrongly used to argue against any proposals for change. The basic argument is that the current situation is the best situation, as it is the result of the finely-honed Invisible Hand.
How? you may ask. Well, have you ever heard a commentator say, let the market work it out? or that’s just the free market in operation? That’s the Invisible Hand of Adam Smith in operation.
Many of us worry about jobs going overseas. Proposals are floated to stem the tide, for example tax imports. The econocrats argue that free trade is an overarching good. To interfere with it is to distort the market, the free market. Nothing should be done. It’s unstated but understood they mean by government. There is no such restriction placed on corporations.
The free market is invoked to explain the high income for CEOs and the low income for the rank-and-file. The CEOs are such a rarefied creature that he must be paid gobs of money. How do we know the CEO is worth it? Because that is the result of the free market, the Invisible Hand in operation.
The Invisible Hand is especially useful to those who have benefited from the status quo. How? They don’t want the status quo changed and the Invisible Hand is the mechanism that put them in their rightful place in the economic universe.
This use of the Invisible Hand in the free market involves circular reasoning. It is non-falsifiable. It can’t be proven wrong. The meaning of the results are backcast into the inputs. Here’s what that means, restricted to a single case, while the free market Invisible Hand is operating on many cases. Say you try to predict who will get the promotion next week. You make your pick. If you were right, then the you feel vindicated. Your pick had the needed skills and works hard enough. If your pick didn’t get promoted, then your pick didn’t have the needed skills or didn’t work hard enough. However, it’s the same person in both cases and your knowledge of the requirements hasn’t changed. You can explain both results, which are contradictory, with the same reasoning. A case of shifting definitions to accommodate the result.
I freely admit there is much wisdom in Adam Smith’s capitalism, but that doesn’t mean it is divine truth.
We should not alter societal needs—equality of opportunity and equal reward for equal work—allowing a mythical Invisible Hand the power to stifle changes to the economic marketplace.
This world is not the best of all possible worlds.
It is the best world we have gotten to so far.