Consumers drive 70% of GDP. Earners in the top 1% of income have received 93% of the income growth since the depths of the Great Recession (Bloomberg). A surprising fact about those high earners. They only consume 21% of their income (Tax Policy Center).
Some people argue that raising the minimum wage will hurt the lowest tier of workers because it will cut the number of jobs that are available to them, yet the statistics show that does not happen. How can such a reasonable line of logic fail to lead to a valid conclusion?
Economic positions, in brief, on capitalism, corporations, inequity, and government role
In pursuit of profit and self-interest, firms can either innovate with new products or collude with competitors. The first benefits society. The second costs society.
When you strip away all the non-economic aspects in Euroland and just focus on the currency, they basically have created fixed currency ratios (only to a single standard rather than to each other’s currencies). Fixed exchange ratios (a la SNAKE) always fail, because there remains different inherent productivity rates which must alter exchange rates –…
Subtitle – The Story of Economic Genius I’m about ¾ finished. Too much biographic detail, gives context for economic problems arose in, but too much biography obstructing the view of the theory for my taste. Pre-WWI Panics. Slowly, dawning recognition of relationship between falling prices, amount of currency in circulation Post-WWI Hyperinflation. Printing of money…
In the ’30s when it was like this before, it didn’t end until bigger worries overshadowed the economic problems of low demand and declining prosperity. The increasing of tariffs and austerity programs made the Great Depression worse.
An emergent quality is seen when the fallacy of composition is examined.
There are two ways that the fallacy of composition comes into play: